4.5 Article

Stream-Lake Connectivity Is an Important Control of Fluvial CO2 Concentrations and Emissions in Catchments

Journal

EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022EA002664

Keywords

stream networks; groundwater; carbon dioxide supersaturation; stream photosynthesis; catchment; stream-lake connectivity

Funding

  1. Independent Research Fund Denmark [0217-00112B]
  2. VELUX Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Streams in cultivated lowlands are often saturated with CO2, but the concentrations decrease downstream with rising water temperature, chlorophyll a concentration, and decreasing groundwater inputs. CO2 concentrations at the outlet of lakes can be reduced due to phytoplankton uptake and atmospheric loss. Plant uptake of CO2 is observed to occur in summer and in the afternoons. Sites with deeper water and low gas transfer velocity retain high CO2 concentrations. The variation in CO2 emission rates in fluvial networks is influenced by various physical, chemical and biological processes.
Streams in cultivated lowlands are commonly supersaturated with CO2 and are a source of CO2 to the atmosphere. Great uncertainties exist regarding the spatiotemporal variations of CO2 concentrations and emission rates in stream-lake fluvial networks and small streams with variable plant cover. We studied this variability and the underlying mechanisms in 40 small, high-alkalinity Danish streams, including 5 catchments with lakes. Generally CO2 concentrations were, on average, 9.2 times those of the atmosphere, declining downstream with rising water temperature, chlorophyll a concentration, and decreasing groundwater inputs. We furthermore observed that the concentrations of CO2 in stream waters declined at the outlet of lakes to values close to or below air saturation due to phytoplankton uptake and atmospheric loss during the long water retention time in the lakes. Downstream, CO2 concentrations were observed to decrease in summer and in the afternoons, which indicate plant uptake of CO2. Sites with deeper water and few plants and low gas transfer velocity retained high CO2 concentrations. Among 38 fluvial networks where emission could be calculated, it varied 10-fold (0.41-4.06 g C m(-2) d(-1)), but the overall mean was constrained to a narrow confidence interval (1.75-2.50 g C m(-2) d(-1)). Our results highlight that a complex of physical, chemical and biological processes cause highly variable carbon dynamics and CO2 emissions in fluvial networks at local and catchment scales making upscaling challenging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available