4.7 Review

Bacterial Cellulose-Based Materials as Dressings for Wound Healing

Journal

PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020424

Keywords

wound healing; bacterial cellulose; chronic wounds; cellulose properties; bacterial cellulose structures; bacterial cellulose composites; bacterial cellulose hydrogels

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacterial cellulose (BC), produced by microorganisms, can be modified to produce different cellulosic formats. BC has advantages for biomedical applications such as easy moldability, high biocompatibility, and tailoring ability. Its hydroxyl residues and nanoporous morphology make it ideal for wound healing. This article discusses the characteristics of different BC structures, recent advances in BC composites, and the development of antimicrobial BC and drug delivery systems.
Bacterial cellulose (BC) is produced by several microorganisms as extracellular structures and can be modified by various physicochemical and biological strategies to produce different cellulosic formats. The main advantages of BC for biomedical applications can be summarized thus: easy moldability, purification, and scalability; high biocompatibility; and straightforward tailoring. The presence of a high amount of free hydroxyl residues, linked with water and nanoporous morphology, makes BC polymer an ideal candidate for wound healing. In this frame, acute and chronic wounds, associated with prevalent pathologies, were addressed to find adequate therapeutic strategies. Hence, the main characteristics of different BC structures-such as membranes and films, fibrous and spheroidal, nanocrystals and nanofibers, and different BC blends, as well as recent advances in BC composites with alginate, collagen, chitosan, silk sericin, and some miscellaneous blends-are reported in detail. Moreover, the development of novel antimicrobial BC and drug delivery systems are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available