4.7 Review

Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib for Management of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: An Evidence-Based Review

Journal

PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14112452

Keywords

atopic dermatitis; eczema; upadacitinib; JAK1 inhibitors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atopic dermatitis is a common skin condition with limited treatment options. Janus kinase inhibitors have been shown to be effective and safe for treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Awareness of the clinical evidence is important for dermatologists to improve patient outcomes.
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common skin condition characterized by inflammation that presents with erythematous and pruritic skin. Its chronic relapse-remitting nature has a significant impact on the quality of life, and often requires ongoing management. Given the limited treatments available for AD, there remains a large need for effective and safe alternative therapies for long-term use. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a new class of agents that target the JAK-STAT pathway, which plays an important role in the production of proinflammatory cytokines involved in AD pathogenesis. Phase II and III clinical trials revealed that JAK inhibitors, such as upadacitinib, are effective and well-tolerated agents for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. As a result, upadacitinib was approved for use in patients with moderate-to-severe AD by the European Medicines Agency (2021), Health Canada (2021) and the FDA (2022) in the last year. It is important for dermatologists to be aware of the clinical evidence to continue incorporating the use of upadacitinib into the treatment algorithm for AD, which will ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes. Therefore, this review is an up-to-date summary of the clinical data available on the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib treatment for AD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available