4.6 Review

The optimal regional irradiation volume for breast cancer patients: A comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis of published studies

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1081201

Keywords

regional irradiation volume; breast cancer; network meta-analysis; survival; systematic review

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a comprehensive network meta-analysis to determine the optimal adjuvant regional nodal irradiation (RNI) volume for breast cancer (BC) patients, and found that internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) significantly improved overall survival, disease-free survival, and distant-metastasis-free survival compared to controls. The study also showed that CW/WB+RNI with IMNI was the best treatment approach for BC patients.
BackgroundCurrently, the optimal adjuvant regional nodal irradiation (RNI) volume for breast cancer (BC) remained controversial. We aimed to define the optimal RNI treatment volume for BC by using a comprehensive network meta-analysis (NMA) of published studies. Materials and methodsPubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from database inception to 30 May 2022. Studies assessing different adjuvant RNI volumes for BC were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and secondary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS) and distant-metastasis-free survival (DMFS). ResultsA total of 29,640 BC patients from twenty studies were included. The pooled hazard ratio demonstrated that internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) in BC patients significantly improved OS giving HR (hazard ratio) of 0.87 (95%CI: 0.83-0.91, p<0.001), DFS with HR of 0.78 (95%CI: 0.68-0.90, p<0.01), and DMFS with HR of 0.87 (95%CI: 0.79-0.97, p<0.01) when compared to controls. Sub-group analysis indicated that RNI with IMNI significantly improved OS (HR 0.87, 95%CI: 0.81-0.93, p<0.01), DFS (HR 0.65, 95%CI: 0.56-0.77, p<0.01), and DMFS (HR 0.90, 95%CI: 0.82-0.98, p=0.02) when compared to RNI without IMNI. NMA showed that CW/WB (chest wall/whole breast) + RNI with IMNI significantly improved DFS (HR 0.93, 95%CI: 0.86-1.00) and DMFS (HR 0.90, 95%CI: 0.81-0.99), but not for OS (HR 0.93, 95%CI: 0.84-1.03) when compared to CW/WB alone. Based on the analysis of the treatment ranking, CW/WB+RNI with IMNI appeared as the best treatment approach for BC patients. ConclusionsOur pooled results demonstrated that RNI with IMNI yielded a significant survival advantage for BC patients. NMA showed that CW/WB+RNI with IMNI was the optimal radiation volume for BC patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available