4.6 Review

Diagnostic value of circulating lncRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1058028

Keywords

gastric cancer; lncRNA; diagnosis; systematic review; meta; analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Major Discipline Construction of Minhang District, Shanghai [8217100675]
  3. Leading Talent Project of Minhang District, Shanghai [2020MWDXK03]
  4. [2021LJRC03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis revealed that serum or plasma lncRNAs have high sensitivity and specificity, making them clinically feasible in diagnosing gastric cancer (GC). The results suggest that peripheral blood lncRNAs may become novel noninvasive biomarkers in the foreseeable future. However, further studies are needed to validate their applicability as cancer biomarkers.
ObjectiveWith the prevalence of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, a large number of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have attracted tremendous attention and have been the topic of extensive research on gastric cancer (GC). It was revealed that lncRNAs not only participate in the transduction of various signaling pathways, thus influencing GC genesis and development, but also have the potential for GC diagnosis. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of previous studies on GC.Materials and methodsAn electronic search was made before August 2021 on databases including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Relevant articles that compare lncRNA expression in GC patients and healthy controls were summarized. We conducted a meta-analysis with the objective of evaluating the ability of lncRNAs in diagnosing GC.ResultsA total of 40 original research studies including 6,772 participants were discussed in this meta-analysis. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.75-0.81), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74-0.83), and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81-0.87), respectively. The value of pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) was 13.00 (95% CI: 10.00-17.00).ConclusionsThis meta-analysis revealed that serum or plasma lncRNAs have high sensitivity and specificity, which makes lncRNAs clinically feasible in diagnosing GC. The results from this meta-analysis demonstrated that peripheral blood lncRNAs may become novel noninvasive biomarkers in the foreseeable future. At the same time, it should be noted that a greater number of blood samples and more evidence from rigorous multicenter clinical studies are necessary to justify their applicability as cancer biomarkers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available