Look how far we have come: BREAST cancer detection education on the international stage

The development of screening mammography over 30 years has remarkedly reduced breast cancer-associated mortality by 20%-30% through detection of small cancer lesions at early stages. Yet breast screening programmes may function differently in each nation depending on the incidence rate, national legislation, local health infrastructure and training opportunities including feedback on performance. Mammography has been the frontline breast cancer screening tool for several decades; however, it is estimated that there are 15% to 35% of cancers missed on screening which are owing to perceptual and decision-making errors by radiologists and other readers. Furthermore, mammography screening is not available in all countries and the increased speed in the number of new breast cancer cases among less developed countries exceeds that of the developed world in recent decades. Studies conducted through the BreastScreen Reader Assessment Strategy (BREAST) training tools for breast screening readers have documented benchmarking and significant variation in diagnostic performances in screening mammogram test sets in different countries. The performance of the radiologists from less well-established breast screening countries such as China, Mongolia and Vietnam were significant lower in detecting early-stage cancers than radiologists from developed countries such as Australia, USA, Singapore, Italy. Differences in breast features and cancer presentations, discrepancies in the level of experiences in reading screening mammograms, the availability of high-quality national breast screening program and breast image interpretation training courses between developed and less developed countries are likely to have impact on the variation of readers' performances. Hence dedicated education training programs with the ability to tailor to different reader cohorts and different population presentations are suggested to ameliorate challenges in exposure to a range of cancer cases and improve the interpretation skills of local radiologists. Findings from this review provide a good understanding of the radiologist' performances and their improvement using the education interventions, primarily the BREAST program, which has been deployed in a large range of developing and developed countries in the last decade. Self-testing and immediate feedback loops have been shown to have important implications for benchmarking and improving the diagnostic accuracy in radiology worldwide for better breast cancer control.

Automated summary

Developments in screening mammography have significantly reduced breast cancer mortality rates by 20%-30% over 30 years. However, screening programs vary in each country due to factors such as incidence rate, legislation, health infrastructure, and training opportunities. Mammography, although widely used, misses 15% to 35% of cancers due to errors by radiologists and readers. Some countries lack access to mammography screening, and less developed countries have seen a rapid increase in breast cancer cases. Variations in diagnostic performance have been observed in different countries, with radiologists from developed countries outperforming those from less established countries. Differences in breast features, experiences, and training contribute to these variations. Tailored education training programs are recommended to improve radiologists' interpretation skills. The findings from the review highlight the effectiveness of interventions such as the BREAST program in improving radiologist performance and diagnostic accuracy. Self-testing and immediate feedback loops are crucial for global benchmarking and better breast cancer control.