4.6 Article

Co-targeting triple-negative breast cancer cells and endothelial cells by metronomic chemotherapy inhibits cell regrowth and migration via downregulation of the FAK/VEGFR2/VEGF axis and autophagy/apoptosis activation

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.998274

Keywords

metronomic chemotherapy; triple negative breast cancer (TNBC); endothelial cells; angiogenesis; FAK-VEGFR2-VEGF-axis

Categories

Funding

  1. A&Q- Polo per la Qualificazione del Sistema Agro-Industriale per indagini di laboratorio collegate allo studio pre-clinico in vitro VICTOR-9
  2. Horizon 2020 Instand-NGS4P [874719]
  3. MIUR, PRIN
  4. Italian Ministry of Health Ricerca Corrente-IRCCS MultiMedica
  5. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC-MFAG) [22818]
  6. Cariplo Foundation [2019-1609]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that metronomic chemotherapy (mCHT) with 5-Fluorouracil plus Vinorelbine (5-FU+VNR) is more effective than standard treatment (STD) in controlling the proliferation, survival, migration, and invasion of endothelial cells (ECs) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells. It also has a strong anti-angiogenic effect. The data suggest that the stabilization of tumor growth observed in TNBC patients treated with mCHT is likely due to its direct cytotoxic effects as well as its anti-metastatic and anti-angiogenic effects.
High-dose standard-of-care chemotherapy is the only option for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, which eventually die due to metastatic tumors. Recently, metronomic chemotherapy (mCHT) showed advantages in treating TNBCs leading us to investigate the anti-metastatic and anti-angiogenic potential of metronomic 5-Fluorouracil plus Vinorelbine (5-FU+VNR) on endothelial cells (ECs) and TNBCs in comparison to standard treatment (STD). We found that 10-fold lower doses of 5-FU+VNR given mCHT vs. STD inhibits cell proliferation and survival of ECs and TNBC cells. Both schedules strongly affect ECs migration and invasion, but in TNBC cells mCHT is significantly more effective than STD in impairing cell migration and invasion. The two treatments disrupt FAK/VEGFR/VEGF signaling in both ECs and TNBC cells. mCHT, and to a much lesser extent STD treatment, induces apoptosis in ECs, whereas it switches the route of cell death from apoptosis (as induced by STD) to autophagy in TNBC cells. mCHT-treated TNBCs-derived conditioned medium also strongly affects ECs' migration, modulates different angiogenesis-associated proteins, and hampers angiogenesis in matrix sponge in vivo. In conclusion, mCHT administration of 5-FU+VNR is more effective than STD schedule in controlling cell proliferation/survival and migration/invasion of both ECs and TNBC cells and has a strong anti-angiogenic effect. Our data suggest that the stabilization of tumor growth observed in TNBC patients treated with mCHT therapy schedule is likely due not only to direct cytotoxic effects but also to anti-metastatic and anti-angiogenic effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available