4.6 Review

Advances in immune checkpoint inhibitor combination strategies for microsatellite stable colorectal cancer

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1112276

Keywords

colorectal cancer; immunotherapy; tyrosine kinase inhibitors; liver metastases; microsatellite stable (MSS)

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the prognosis for several tumor types, but have shown limited success in treating metastatic colorectal tumors that are microsatellite stable (MSS). However, recent studies have demonstrated promising results with novel combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors in MSS colorectal cancer. This review examines the underlying biological factors contributing to the lack of response to immunotherapy in MSS colorectal cancer and explores potential strategies to overcome innate resistance mechanisms.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have reshaped the prognostic of several tumor types, including metastatic colorectal tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI). However, 90-95% of metastatic colorectal tumors are microsatellite stable (MSS) in which immunotherapy has failed to demonstrate meaningful clinical results. MSS colorectal tumors are considered immune-cold tumors. Several factors have been proposed to account for this lack of response to immune checkpoint blockade including low levels of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, low tumor mutational burden, a high rate of WNT/beta-catenin pathway mutations, and liver metastases which have been associated with immunosuppression. However, studies with novel combinations based on immune checkpoint inhibitors are showing promising activity in MSS colorectal cancer. Here, we review the underlying biological facts that preclude immunotherapy activity, and detail the different immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations evaluated, along with novel immune-based therapies, to overcome innate mechanisms of resistance in MSS colorectal cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available