4.6 Article

Systemically Identifying Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtype-Specific Prognosis Signatures, Based on Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data

Journal

CELLS
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells12030367

Keywords

single-cell RNA-seq; TNBC subtype-specific; prognosis signature

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By using single-cell RNA-seq and bioinformatics approach, we identified TNBC subtype-specific prognosis signatures and confirmed their association with cancer development. Further validation demonstrated the potential of these signatures as prognostic markers for individualized treatment of TNBC patients.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease with different molecular subtypes. Although progress has been made, the identification of TNBC subtype-associated biomarkers is still hindered by traditional RNA-seq or array technologies, since bulk data detected by them usually have some non-disease tissue samples, or they are confined to measure the averaged properties of whole tissues. To overcome these constraints and discover TNBC subtype-specific prognosis signatures (TSPSigs), we proposed a single-cell RNA-seq-based bioinformatics approach for identifying TSPSigs. Notably, the TSPSigs we developed mostly were found to be disease-related and involved in cancer development through investigating their enrichment analysis results. In addition, the prognostic power of TSPSigs was successfully confirmed in four independent validation datasets. The multivariate analysis results showed that TSPSigs in two TNBC subtypes-BL1 and LAR, were two independent prognostic factors. Further, analysis results of the TNBC cell lines revealed that the TSPSigs expressions and drug sensitivities had significant associations. Based on the preceding data, we concluded that TSPSigs could be exploited as novel candidate prognostic markers for TNBC patients and applied to individualized treatment in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available