4.6 Article

An estimate of Lyme borreliosis incidence in Western Europe

Journal

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 74-81

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw017

Keywords

epidemiology; public health; research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Lyme borreliosis (LB) is the most common zoonotic disease transmitted by ticks in the USA and Europe. This review aims to estimate the regional burden of LB inWestern Europe. Data from previous publications will be used to calculate the mean incidence. The mean incidence rates will then be combined to estimate the regional burden and a population-weighted regional burden of disease based on the standardized incidence rate from the included studies and the total population at risk. Methods Reviews and surveillance reports identified by the initial database search were assessed for eligibility first by their title and abstract and subsequently by a more detailed review of the source by two independent authors for the most recent data regarding LB. Eleven sources of incidence data were included in the review representing 17 countries in total. Incidence estimates were calculated from reported values and population data. Results Countries inWestern Europe have a large variance in the incidence rates. The highest reported incidences for LB were reported in southern Sweden with 464/100 000 and the lowest in Italy of 0.001/100 000. The unweighted mean for the included data provided an incidence rate of 56.3/100 000 persons per year, equating to similar to 232 125 cases in 1 year throughout the region. The calculated population-weighted average incidence rate for the regional burden of LB inWestern Europe was 22.05 cases per 100 000 person-years. Conclusions LB is a continually emerging disease and the most common zoonotic infection inWestern Europe approaching endemic proportions in many European countries. The population-weighted incidence rate has been estimated by this study to be 22.04/100 000 person-years. Concordant and well-conducted surveillance and disease awareness should continue to be encouraged to monitor LB, as tick numbers and activity are increasing, leading to greater risks of infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available