4.6 Review

The Role of Branched-Chain Amino Acid Supplementation in Combination with Locoregional Treatments for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

CANCERS
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030926

Keywords

cancer; hepatocellular carcinoma; liver cancer; cirrhosis; interventional radiology; nutrition; amino acids; supplements

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Numerous studies have investigated the use of branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) supplements in patients with cirrhosis and liver cancer, with reported benefits including improved survival rates and hepatic functional reserve. However, the potential role of BCAA supplementation in conjunction with locoregional therapies for liver cancer remains unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis of articles investigating BCAA supplementation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing interventional radiology procedures revealed significantly higher post-treatment albumin levels, suggesting potential benefits in combination with locoregional treatments. However, current data are insufficient to support additional benefits.
Simple Summary The use of branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) supplements in patients with cirrhosis and liver cancer has been investigated by numerous studies, with multiple reported benefits including improvements in survival rates and hepatic functional reserve. Although locoregional therapies for liver cancer have gained momentum over the past few decades, the potential role of BCAA supplementation in conjunction with these procedures has not yet been elucidated. In this study, we systematically analyze articles investigating the role of BCAA supplementation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing interventional radiology procedures. Our systematic review and meta-analysis reveals that BCAA supplementation is associated with significantly higher post-treatment albumin levels, which may support their use in combination with locoregional treatments for HCC. There is a tendency for improved overall survival, mortality and recurrence rates; however, current data are insufficient to support additional benefits. Background: Branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) supplementation has been linked with favorable outcomes in patients undergoing surgical or palliative treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To date, there has been no systematic review investigating the value of BCAA supplementation in HCC patients undergoing locoregional therapies. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed across five databases/registries using a detailed search algorithm according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. The search was conducted on 23 March 2022. Results: Sixteen studies with a total of 1594 patients were analyzed. Most patients were male (64.6%) with a mean age of 68.2 +/- 4.1 years, Child-Pugh score A (67.9%) and stage II disease (40.0%). Locoregional therapy consisted of radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolization or hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy. BCAA supplementation was in the form of BCAA granules or BCAA-enriched nutrient. Most studies reported improved albumin levels, non-protein respiratory quotient and quality of life in the BCAA group. Results pertaining to other outcomes including overall survival, recurrence rate, and Child-Pugh score were variable. Meta-analysis showed significantly higher levels of post-treatment serum albumin in the BCAA group (SMD = 0.54, 95% CI 0.20-0.87) but no significant differences in mortality rate (RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.65-1.02) and AST (SMD = -0.13, 95% CI: -0.43-0.18). Conclusion: BCAA supplementation is associated with higher post-treatment albumin levels. There are currently not sufficient data to support additional benefits. Further studies are needed to elucidate their value.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available