4.7 Article

Prediction of Functional Outcome in Stroke Patients with Proximal Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusions Using Machine Learning Models

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030839

Keywords

ischemic stroke; machine learning; medical decision making; middle cerebral artery; artificial intelligence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By using machine learning models and clinical, laboratory, and quantitative imaging data as inputs, we were able to accurately predict the short- and medium-term functional outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients with proximal middle cerebral artery occlusions.
At present, clinicians are expected to manage a large volume of complex clinical, laboratory, and imaging data, necessitating sophisticated analytic approaches. Machine learning-based models can use this vast amount of data to create forecasting models. We aimed to predict short- and medium-term functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with proximal middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions using machine learning models with clinical, laboratory, and quantitative imaging data as inputs. Included were consecutive AIS patients with MCA M1 and proximal M2 occlusions. The XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and Random Forest were used to predict the outcome. Minimum redundancy maximum relevancy was used for selecting features. The primary outcomes were the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) shift and the modified Rankin Score (mRS) at 90 days. The algorithm with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for predicting the favorable and unfavorable outcome groups at 90 days was LightGBM. Random Forest had the highest AUROC when predicting the favorable and unfavorable groups based on the NIHSS shift. Using clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters in conjunction with machine learning, we accurately predicted the functional outcome of AIS patients with proximal MCA occlusions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available