4.7 Article

Free Light Chains, High Mobility Group Box 1, and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11236904

Keywords

uremic toxin; free light chains; HMGB1; CD4+; CD8+ratio; hemodialysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated FLCs and HMGB1 levels in hemodialysis patients, finding a correlation with immune dysfunction and inflammation. The results suggest that cFLCs and HMGB1 could serve as independent markers for mortality risk in HD patients.
Background: Uremic toxins are associated with immune dysfunction and inflammation. The inadequate removal by hemodialysis (HD) of serum free light chains (FLCs) determines their accumulation. This study evaluated FLCs in HD patients, analyzing their relations with other biomarkers, such as serum high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1). Methods: FLC and HMGB1 were evaluated in a cohort of 119 HD patients. kappa FLC and lambda FLC were summated to give a combined (c) FLC concentration. Patients were followed prospectively until the end of the observation period of four years, or until the endpoint: the patient's death. Results: cFLC values in HD patients were 244.4 (197.9-273.5) mg/L. We detected a significant reduction in CD8+ cells and a decreased CD4+/CD8+ ratio. HMGB1 levels were 94.5 (55-302) pg/mL. After multivariate analysis, cFLCs correlated with beta 2-microglobulin and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio. Subjects with cFLC values above 263 mg/L and with sHMGB1 values < 80 pg/mL experienced a significantly faster evolution to the endpoint (mean follow-up time to progression of 27.5 and 28.5 months, respectively; p < 0.001). After an adjusted multivariate Cox analysis, cFLCs were associated with 11% increased risk of death, whereas low sHMGB1 increased this risk by 5%. Conclusions: cFLCs and HMGB1 reflect the inflammation and immune dysfunction in HD patients representing two strong and independent risk markers of mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available