4.7 Article

Influence of Metal Implants on Quantitative Evaluation of Bone Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11226732

Keywords

bone; computed tomography-based attenuation correction; single-photon emission computed tomography; computed tomography; metal implant; standardized uptake value

Funding

  1. National Mutual Insurance Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives (ZENKYOREN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study created a phantom simulating nonunion of the femur and used SPECT/CT to measure the count of gamma rays. The results found that metal implants, CT-based attenuation correction, and implant position significantly affect the count.
When visualizing biological activity at nonunion sites by the radioisotopes, gamma rays are more attenuated if metal implants are placed in the bone. However, the effects of various implant types and their placement on gamma ray attenuation in quantitative evaluation remain unknown. To elucidate these effects, we created a phantom that simulated the nonunion of the femur in this study. The count of gamma rays was measured by single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) while considering CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC), metal implant placement, type (intramedullary nail or plate), and position. The count differed significantly with and without CTAC and with and without implants (both types) under CTAC. Significantly different counts were observed between the intramedullary nail and plate placed contralaterally to the lesion (i.e., non-lesion side). No significant difference was observed between the intramedullary nail and plate on the lesion side or between plates on the non-lesion and lesion sides. The measured standardized uptake value (SUV) was closer to the true SUV with CTAC than without. Moreover, the count was higher with implants than without. However, even with implants, it was lower than the actual count, indicating the absence of overcorrection. Implant type and position do not seem to influence the count.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available