4.7 Article

Surgical Strategies to Dissect around the Superior Mesenteric Artery in Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11237112

Keywords

robotic surgery; pancreatoduodenectomy; surgical approach; superior mesenteric artery; pancreatic cancer

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. [21K16447]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents surgical strategies for dissecting around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD). Depending on the case, different approaches can be selected, including a right approach and a combined left and right approach. Surgeons can choose the most appropriate surgical approach by considering demographic, anatomical, and oncological factors.
The concept of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA)-first approach has been widely accepted in pancreatoduodenectomy. However, few studies have reported surgical approaches to the SMA in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD). Herein, we present our surgical strategies to dissect around the SMA in RPD. Among the various approaches, our standard protocol for RPD included the right approach to the SMA, which can result in complete tumor resection in most cases. In patients with malignant diseases requiring lymphadenectomy around the SMA, we developed a novel approach by combining the left and right approaches in RPD. Using this approach, circumferential dissection around the SMA can be achieved through both the left and right sides. This approach can also be helpful in patients with obesity or intra-abdominal adhesions. The present study summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of both the approaches during RPD. To perform RPD safely, surgeons should understand the different surgical approaches and select the best approach or a combination of different approaches, depending on demographic, anatomical, and oncological factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available