4.7 Article

Diagnostic Concordance between Research and Clinical-Based Assessments of Psychiatric Comorbidity in Anorexia Nervosa

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247419

Keywords

anorexia nervosa; psychiatric comorbidity; inter-rater reliability; SCID-5; diagnostic assessment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Literature has shown poor concordance in psychiatric condition assessment and heterogeneity in the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities in Anorexia Nervosa (AN). This study aimed to investigate the level of concordance between clinicians' and researchers' diagnoses of psychiatric comorbidity in AN, as well as differences in eating and general psychopathology between patients with and without psychiatric comorbidity assessed by clinicians versus researchers. The findings highlighted the importance of carefully assessing comorbidity in AN.
The literature has reported poor concordance in the assessment of psychiatric conditions, and inhomogeneity in the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities in Anorexia Nervosa (AN). We aimed to investigate concordance level between clinicians' and researchers' diagnoses of psychiatric comorbidity in AN and differences in eating and general psychopathology between patients with and without psychiatric comorbidity assessed by clinicians versus researchers. A clinical psychiatrist interviewed 122 patients with AN; then a researcher administered the Structured and Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5). Participants completed the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The agreement between clinicians and researchers was poor for all diagnoses but obsessive-compulsive disorder and substance use disorder. Patients with comorbid disorders diagnosed by researchers reported more severe eating and general psychopathology than those without SCID-comorbidity. The differences between patients with and without comorbidities assessed by a clinician were smaller. Two approaches to psychiatry comorbidity assessment emerged: SCID-5 diagnoses yield a precise and rigorous assessment, while clinicians tend to consider some symptoms as secondary to the eating disorder rather than as part of another psychiatric condition, seeing the clinical picture as a whole. Overall, the study highlights the importance of carefully assessing comorbidity in AN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available