4.7 Article

Impact of a Weight-Loss Rehabilitation Program on Sleep Apnea Risk and Subjective Sleepiness in Patients with Overweight/Obesity: The DietSleep Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11236890

Keywords

weight loss; obstructive sleep apnea; sleepiness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the impact of a weight-loss program on OSA risk and daytime sleepiness. The results showed that the program led to significant weight loss and improvement in both OSA and subjective daytime sleepiness.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is one of the most frequent chronic diseases, and comorbid obesity occurs in more than 60% of cases. Variations in body weight influence both OSA severity and OSA-related symptoms. We prospectively assessed the impact of a weight-loss program using the Berlin score to reflect OSA risk, and we also used the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) to assess daytime sleepiness. DietSleep was a prospective multicentric cohort study investigating OSA risk and daytime sleepiness before and after weight-loss intervention. One hundred and twenty-seven patients were included (initial OSA risk 36%), most of whom were women (85.8%) with a median body mass index (BMI) of 29.7 kg/m(2), and the interquartile range was (27.6; 34). The diet-based weight-loss program induced a median decrease in BMI of 3.7 kg/m(2) (-5; -2.9) (body weight similar to 12.1% (-16.0; -8.8)) over a period of 171 days (114; 269). Changes in anthropometric values were similar regarding OSA risk after adjusting for initial values. Berlin scores significantly improved from 3 (1; 5) to 1 (0; 2), p < 0.01; the proportion of patients with a Berlin score >= 2 decreased from 36% to 7% after the intervention. The proportion of patients with ESS >= 11 decreased from 13% to 2%. These results confirm that a weight-loss program produces clinically relevant weight loss and a significant improvement in both OSA and subjective daytime sleepiness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available