Pharmacokinetics and efficacy of topical inserts containing tenofovir alafenamide fumarate and elvitegravir administered rectally in macaques

Background Topical on-demand forms for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may be a desirable alternative for people that prefer not to use daily PrEP. CONRAD has developed inserts containing tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and elvitegravir (EVG) for on-demand vaginal or rectal pericoital use. We assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pre-exposure efficacy of rectally applied TAF/EVG inserts in macaques. Methods PK was assessed in 12 pigtailed macaques. Tenofovir (TFV) and EVG levels were assayed in rectal biopsies and secretions, and tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP) levels in biopsies and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Drug biodistribution was evaluated in 10 animals at necropsy 4 h post-dosing. For efficacy assessments, one or two TAF/EVG inserts were administered to macaques (n = 6) 4 h before repeated rectal SHIV162p3 challenges. Findings One TAF/EVG insert resulted in rapid and high EVG and TFV-DP in rectal tissue 4 h after application. Adding a second insert led to a 10-fold increase in EVG and TFV-DP in rectal tissue. Efficacy of one and two TAF/EVG inserts were 72.6% (CI 24.5%-92.6%) and 93.1% (CI 73.3%-99.2%), respectively. Interpretation Although high TFV-DP and EVG levels were observed with one rectal TAF/EVG insert, it only conferred partial protection from rectal SHIV challenges. Adding a second insert led to an increase in TFV and EVG in rectal tissues resulting in higher (>90%) efficacy. These results highlight the high efficacy of TAF/EVG inserts as topical on-demand rectal PrEP, as well as the need for appropriate drug coverage in the deep rectum and colon to achieve high protection. Copyright (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Automated summary

This study assessed the pharmacokinetics and pre-exposure efficacy of rectally applied TAF/EVG inserts in macaques, with results showing that using two inserts is more effective in prevention compared to using one, achieving a success rate of 93.1%.