4.8 Article

Protection against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 variant challenge in macaques by prime-boost vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S and SpFN

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 8, Issue 47, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.ade4433

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Defense [W81XWH-18-2-0040]
  2. Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc. [W81XWH-18-2-0040]
  3. National Institutes of Health [CA260476]
  4. Massachusetts Consortium for Pathogen Readiness
  5. Ragon Institute
  6. Musk Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of two SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in nonhuman primates. Despite differences in immune responses generated by different regimens, similar protective efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron challenge was observed.
Emerging severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants and waning immunity call for next-generation vaccine strategies. Here, we assessed the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of two SARS-CoV-2 vaccines targeting the WA1/2020 spike protein, Ad26.COV2.S (Ad26) and Spike ferritin Nanoparticle (SpFN), in nonhuman primates, delivered as either a homologous (SpFN/SpFN and Ad26/Ad26) or heterologous (Ad26/SpFN) prime-boost regimen. The Ad26/SpFN regimen elicited the highest CD4 T cell and memory B cell responses, the SpFN/SpFN regimen generated the highest binding and neutralizing antibody responses, and the Ad26/Ad26 regimen generated the most robust CD8 T cell responses. Despite these differences, protective ef-ficacy against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 challenge was similar for all three regimens. After challenge, all vacci-nated monkeys showed significantly reduced peak and day 4 viral loads in both bronchoalveolar lavage and nasal swabs as compared with sham animals. The efficacy conferred by these three immunologically distinct vaccine regimens suggests that both humoral and cellular immunity contribute to protection against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron challenge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available