4.8 Article

Deep top-down proteomics revealed significant proteoform-level differences between metastatic and nonmetastatic colorectal cancer cells

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 8, Issue 51, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abq6348

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [R01CA247863]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) [R01GM125991, R01GM118470]
  3. National Science Foundation (CAREER Award) [DBI1846913]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding cancer metastasis at the proteoform level is crucial for discovering new protein biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and drug development. This study compared proteoform and single amino acid variant profiles of two colorectal cancer cell lines, revealing substantial differences and identifying differentially expressed proteoforms closely related to cancer.
Understanding cancer metastasis at the proteoform level is crucial for discovering previously unknown protein biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and drug development. We present the first top-down proteomics (TDP) study of a pair of isogenic human nonmetastatic and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines (SW480 and SW620). We identified 23,622 proteoforms of 2332 proteins from the two cell lines, representing nearly fivefold improve-ment in the number of proteoform identifications (IDs) compared to previous TDP datasets of human cancer cells. We revealed substantial differences between the SW480 and SW620 cell lines regarding proteoform and single amino acid variant (SAAV) profiles. Quantitative TDP unveiled differentially expressed proteoforms between the two cell lines, and the corresponding genes had diversified functions and were closely related to cancer. Our study represents a pivotal advance in TDP toward the characterization of human proteome in a proteoform-specific manner, which will transform basic and translational biomedical research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available