4.6 Article

Thin Layers of SrTiO3-TiO2 with Eutectic Composition for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting

Journal

COATINGS
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings12121876

Keywords

magnetron sputtering; SrTiO3; TiO2; PEC; water splitting; hydrogen

Funding

  1. SONATA Project from the National Science Centre [2016/23/D/ST5/02882]
  2. ENSEMBLE3 Project within the Teaming for Excellence Horizon 2020 programme of the European Commission [857543]
  3. International Research Agendas Programme of the Foundation for Polish Science [MAB/2020/14]
  4. European Union under the European Regional Development Fund
  5. Teaming Horizon 2020 programme of the European Commission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, photoelectrochemical electrodes based on SrTiO3-TiO2 were fabricated and their photoactivity was investigated. The results showed that a 50 nm thick layer prepared on titanium had the highest photocurrent density.
Hydrogen as a potential fuel of the future can be produced in a photoelectrochemial water splitting process. Herein, we demonstrate the fabrication of photoelectrochemical electrodes based on SrTiO3-TiO2 with a eutectic composition on titanium and conductive glass FTO (fluorine doped tin oxide) substrates by magnetron sputtering. The XRD and SEM/EDS reveal the amorphous nature and homogeneity of the sputtered material. The influence of the layer thickness on the photoactivity was investigated. There were three-layer thicknesses (50, 350, and 750 nm) selected by sputtering for 12, 80 and 220 min for the preparation of photoelectrodes. The photoelectrochemical analysis confirms the photoactivity of the obtained layers under illumination with a xenon lamp (600 mW/cm(2)). The highest photocurrent density of 11.8 x 10(-3) mAcm(-2) at 1.2 V vs. SCE was recorded for a layer thickness of 50 nm on titanium as better matching between the Ti work function and the conduction band.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available