4.6 Article

How do Graphene Composite Surfaces Affect the Development and Structure of Marine Cyanobacterial Biofilms?

Journal

COATINGS
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings12111775

Keywords

antifouling surface; biofilm architecture; cyanobacterial biofilm; graphene; marine biofouling

Funding

  1. FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) [LA/P/0045/2020, UIDB/00511/2020, UIDP/00511/2020, PTDC/CTM-COM/4844/2020]
  2. Norte Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000069]
  3. Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [UIDB/04423/2020, UIDP/04423/2020]
  4. FEDER through the NORTE 2020 Program [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000040]
  5. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  6. European Union [952471]
  7. FCT [SFRH/BD/140080/2018, CEECIND/01700/2017, CEECINST/00049/2018]
  8. EURO-MIC COST Action [CA20130]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the influence of graphene nanoplatelet-modified surfaces on cyanobacterial biofilm formation in a simulated marine environment. The results showed that the graphene nanoplatelet composite reduced biofilm formation and coverage, and delayed biofilm development.
The progress of nanotechnology has prompted the development of novel marine antifouling coatings. In this study, the influence of a pristine graphene nanoplatelet (GNP)-modified surface in cyanobacterial biofilm formation was evaluated over a long-term assay using an in vitro platform which mimics the hydrodynamic conditions that prevail in real marine environments. Surface characterization by Optical Profilometry and Scanning Electron Microscopy has shown that the main difference between GNP incorporated into a commercially used epoxy resin (GNP composite) and both control surfaces (glass and epoxy resin) was related to roughness and topography, where the GNP composite had a roughness value about 1000 times higher than control surfaces. The results showed that, after 7 weeks, the GNP composite reduced the biofilm wet weight (by 44%), biofilm thickness (by 54%), biovolume (by 82%), and surface coverage (by 64%) of cyanobacterial biofilms compared to the epoxy resin. Likewise, the GNP-modified surface delayed cyanobacterial biofilm development, modulated biofilm structure to a less porous arrangement over time, and showed a higher antifouling effect at the biofilm maturation stage. Overall, this nanocomposite seems to have the potential to be used as a long-term antifouling material in marine applications. Moreover, this multifactorial study was crucial to understanding the interactions between surface properties and cyanobacterial biofilm development and architecture over time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available