4.6 Article

Comparative Study of Anti-Sticking Properties of Coatings for Tire Molds

Journal

COATINGS
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings12111740

Keywords

coatings; anti-sticking property; tire mold; rubber

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51905317]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2020ME047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By selecting different coatings, the anti-sticking performance of tire molds was improved. The microstructure and chemical composition of the coatings affected the demolding force and residual pollutants.
To improve the anti-sticking performance of tire molds, six types of coatings (i.e., nano-ceramic coating, bilayer waterborne polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) coating, fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP)-based Whitford coating, PTFE, FEP, and perfluoroalkoxy (PFA) aqueous dispersions) were selected to modify type-45 steel specimens by air spraying. Their wettability, microstructure, demolding force, and anti-fouling properties in rubber vulcanization tests were studied. The results show that the demolding forces of the coatings were at least 24% lower than that of uncoated surface. Whitford coating, PFA, and FEP coatings had zero demolding force and no pollutant residue. PTFE coating had no pollutant residue but had high demolding force. The other two coatings had poor anti-sticking property. Upon combining the surface morphology and chemical composition analysis results, the coating demolding force was related to the surface micro-morphology: smoother surfaces led to lower demolding forces, while the surface chemical composition had a direct influence on the rubber contaminant residual. The C-F bonds on the surfaces resulted in less rubber residual due to intrinsic low surface energy. X-ray photoelectron spectrometry (XPS) analysis showed that ZnS was one of the main pollutants after rubber vulcanization test.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available