4.6 Article

Corrosion Behaviors of Fe-22Cr-16Mn-0.55N High-Nitrogen Austenitic Stainless Steel in 3.5% NaCl Solution

Journal

COATINGS
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings12111769

Keywords

high nitrogen austenitic stainless steel; solution treatment; corrosion; passive film

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Project of the State Grid Hunan Electric Power Company
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China
  3. GDAS' Project of Science and Technology Development
  4. [5216A520002T]
  5. [2021YFB3701704]
  6. [2022GDASZH-2022010103]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the corrosion behavior of high-nitrogen austenitic stainless steel before and after solution treatment. The results show that solution treatment reduces the grain size and increases the uniformity of the grains. It also results in a more compact passive film, leading to improved corrosion resistance.
In this study, the corrosion behavior of the high-nitrogen austenitic stainless steel (HNS) Fe-22Cr-16Mn-0.55N before and after solution treatment (ST) in 3.5% NaCl solution has been investigated. The effect of a solution temperature of 1100 degrees C and heat preservation for 30 min on the corrosion resistance and passive film protection of HNS steel was studied. Open-circuit potential, potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance tests were used to assess the corrosion resistance of treated and untreated steels. In addition, potentiostatic polarization and XPS techniques together with Mott-Schottky curves were applied to determine the composition and properties of the passive films. The results showed that after solution treatment, the grain size of HNS decreased and the grain became more uniform. Although corrosion occurred on HNSs both before and after treatment, solution treatment resulted in greater compactness in passive films, leading to lower carrier density, lower corrosion current density and better corrosion resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available