4.7 Article

Galvanic corrosion behavior of 5083 alloy/H62 brass couple under magnetic field

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.140

Keywords

Magnetic field; Corrosion behavior; Galvanic corrosion; The mixed potential theory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The galvanic corrosion behavior of 5083 alloy/H62 brass couple in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution under different magnetic field strengths was studied. It was found that the magnetic field can impede the corrosion of 5083 alloy while accelerating the corrosion of H62 brass. The inhibition effect of magnetic field on galvanic corrosion increased with the intensity of the magnetic field.
Galvanic corrosion behavior of 5083 alloy/H62 brass couple in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution under 0, 0.2 and 0.4 T magnetic field were studied by microstructure observation, immersion test and electrochemical measurement. The mixed potential theory was used to estimate the galvanic current density and the mixed potential of the galvanic corrosion between 5083 alloy and H62 brass. The results indicated that magnetic field can impede the corrosion of 5083 alloy, and accelerate the corrosion process of H62 brass. The effect of magnetic field on corrosion of these two alloys increased as the intensity rising. Magnetic field can reduce the galvanic corrosion sensibility and corrosion rate of 5083 alloy/H62 brass couple. With increase of magnetic field intensity, the inhibition effect of magnetic field on galvanic corrosion of the couple increased. The effects of magnetic field on the galvanic corrosion performance of the couple and the corrosion behavior of 5083 alloy and H62 brass were due to the appearance of magnetohydrodynamic flow. The mixed potential theory has a certain accuracy to estimate the Ecouple and icouple values in this paper.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available