4.7 Article

Wetting and interfacial interaction of molten iron on MgO substrate under different oxygen partial pressures

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages 4607-4618

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.045

Keywords

Wetting behavior; Interfacial interaction; Molten iron; Magnesia aggregate; Oxygen partial pressure; Sessile drop method

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. [U1860205]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interactions between molten iron and three different magnesia aggregates were studied, and it was found that the oxygen partial pressures had minimal effect on the interaction mechanism. No. 2 substrate had the largest interacted area with molten iron, while No. 1 substrate exhibited better resistance to FeO corrosion. The larger bulk density and grain size of No. 3 substrate could reduce the FeO penetration.
The interaction between molten iron and refractory is of great significance to understand the damage of refractory in steelmaking processes. In this work, the interactions between the molten iron and three kinds of magnesia aggregates: No. 1 containing CaZrO3-ZrO2 intergranular phase (mainly CaZrO3), No. 2 containing ZrO2-MgAl2O4 intergranular phase (mainly ZrO2) and No. 3 fused magnesia, were studied by the sessile drop method at 1823 K under two kinds of oxygen partial pressures of PO2 = 1.87 x 10-1 Pa and PO2 = 1.87 x 10-3 Pa. It was found that the interaction mechanism between molten iron and substrate was almost the same under the two oxygen partial pressures. No. 2 substrate had a larger interacted area with molten iron due to its physical properties and chemical composition and more amount of slag was formed between them. The oxygen was easy to be released from the closed pores in No. 2 substrate so that the molten iron on No. 2 substrate had higher oxygen content, resulting in the decreases of the contact angle and the surface tension of molten iron. Accordingly, No. 2 substrate was penetrated most seriously. The intergranular phase of No. 1 substrate was more resistant to FeO corrosion than that of No. 2 substrate. The FeO penetration into No. 3 substrate was mainly along the grain boundary. The larger bulk density and grain size of No. 3 substrate could reduce the FeO penetration.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available