4.7 Article

Constraints on the Lithospheric Kinematics in the Aegean and Western Anatolia Unveiled by SKS Splitting Observations

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
Volume 127, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022JB025265

Keywords

seismic anisotropy; shear wave splitting; two-layer anisotropy; western Anatolia; complex mantle deformation; Aegean

Funding

  1. Istanbul Technical University Research Fund (ITU-BAP) Turkish National Scientific, Technological Foundation (TUBITAK)
  2. Turkish Academy of Science in the framework for Young Scientist Award Program (TUBA-GEBIP)
  3. Science Academy, Turkey - Young Scientist Awards Program (BAGEP)
  4. Alexander von Humboldt-Foundation (AvH)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the azimuthal anisotropy in the back-arc region of the Hellenic subduction zone and its relation to geodynamical processes. The results reveal NE-SW oriented fast polarization directions and delay times between 0.65 and 2.2 s. The observed seismic anisotropy is mainly attributed to the internal deformation of the mantle lithosphere and asthenosphere.
The present study investigates azimuthal anisotropy and its relation to the geodynamical processes beneath the back-arc of the Hellenic subduction zone in the eastern Aegean and western Anatolia where surface tectonics is dominated by the right-lateral strike-slip North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) in the north and E-W oriented normal fault systems. We obtained apparent SKS splitting parameters from 1,660 good quality and 137 null measurements extracted from 542 events recorded at 40 permanent broadband seismic stations. Overall, the station-averaged splitting parameters indicate NNE-SSW oriented fast directions (similar to N20 degrees E) and splitting delays around similar to 1.5 s. The large splitting delays, particularly observed beneath the northern Aegean can be explained by either an enlarged mantle wedge thickness or increased strength of upper mantle anisotropy. We constrain complex anisotropy structures within two layer models from notable backazimuthal variations in individual splitting measurements observed beneath a few stations at the north located in a close proximity to the NAFZ and central-western Anatolia. At the western end of the NAFZ, our estimated upper layer anisotropy direction (at similar to 120 km) is rather parallel to the NAFZ reflecting the imprint of a lithospheric petrofabric formed by recent deformation while in central-western Anatolia they correlate well with maximum shear directions and small splitting delays (similar to 0.6 s) appear to further support relatively thin lithosphere (similar to 90 km). An overall pattern of extension-parallel fast directions (N10 degrees E) within lower layer can be attributed to the slab rollback-induced mantle flow that is highly oblique with respect to the WSW-ward motion of the Anatolian lithosphere. Plain Language Summary Seismological constrains on uppermost mantle structures provide essential information for better understanding of the geodynamic processes that have shaped the current deformation in complex tectonic regions. To investigate the seismic anisotropy, which is the directional dependence of seismic wave velocities, and its relation to the geodynamical processes in the upper mantle of eastern Aegean and western Anatolia, we performed splitting measurements on core-mantle refracted shear waves recorded by 40 permanent broadband seismic stations. We overall estimate NE-SW oriented fast polarization directions, and delay times between 0.65 and 2.2 s. The results imply that the origin of observed seismic anisotropy can be mostly explained by a combined effect of an internal deformation of the mantle lithosphere and asthenosphere. Our findings reveal the presence of two-layer anisotropy outlining complicated structures, primarily in the upper mantle of NW Anatolia associated with the western end of North Anatolian Fault Zone. Future numerical modeling and anisotropy studies should be considered to test these results for further interpretation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available