4.6 Article

Correlations between cortical gyrification and schizophrenia symptoms with and without comorbid hostility symptoms

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1092784

Keywords

schizophrenia; psychosis; neuroimaging; gyrification; magnetic resonance imaging; hostility

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The severity of symptoms in schizophrenia is associated with abnormal cortical gyrification, especially in the frontal and temporal lobes. Patients with low hostility symptoms showed lower local gyrification index in these areas compared to patients with high hostility symptoms.
IntroductionInterest in identifying the clinical implications of the neuropathophysiological background of schizophrenia is rising, including changes in cortical gyrification that may be due to neurodevelopmental abnormalities. Inpatients with schizophrenia can show abnormal gyrification of cortical regions correlated with the symptom severity. MethodsOur study included 36 patients that suffered an acute episode of schizophrenia and have undergone structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to calculate the local gyrification index (LGI). ResultsIn the whole sample, the severity of symptoms significantly correlated with higher LGI in different cortical areas, including bilateral frontal, cingulate, parietal, temporal cortices, and right occipital cortex. Among these areas, patients with low hostility symptoms (LHS) compared to patients with high hostility symptoms (HHS) showed significantly lower LGI related to the severity of symptoms in bilateral frontal and temporal lobes. DiscussionThe severity of psychopathology correlated with higher LGI in large portions of the cerebral cortex, possibly expressing abnormal neural development in schizophrenia. These findings could pave the way for further studies and future tailored diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available