4.7 Article

Combined treatment by burosumab and a calcimimetic can ameliorate hypophosphatemia due to excessive actions of FGF23 and PTH in adult XLH with tertiary hyperparathyroidism: A case report

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1004624

Keywords

X-linked hypophosphatemia; tertiary hyperparathyroidism; fibroblast growth factor 23; parathyroid hormone; burosumab; evocalcet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This report describes a case of adult XLH and tertiary hyperparathyroidism, finding that serum phosphate levels remained low despite burosumab treatment. Treatment with the calcimimetic evocalcet increased serum phosphate levels and tubular maximum reabsorption of phosphate. Therefore, evaluating the presence of hyperparathyroidism is important in patients whose serum phosphate levels do not increase with burosumab treatment.
IntroductionX-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) is the most prevalent type of heritable fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23)-related hypophosphatemic rickets. Recently, anti-FGF23 antibody, burosumab, has become clinically available. We herein report a patient with adult XLH and tertiary hyperparathyroidism. Case presentationThe serum phosphate level and tubular maximum reabsorption of phosphate per glomerular filtration rate (TmP/GFR) remained low, despite burosumab treatment. While the influence of the relationship between FGF23 and parathyroid hormone (PTH) on the phosphaturic effect is unclear, it was considered that a high level of PTH due to tertiary hyperparathyroidism remains to suppress renal phosphate reabsorption. A calcimimetic, evocalcet, increased the serum phosphate level and TmP/GFR. Discussion and conclusionTherefore, it is important to evaluate the presence of secondary-tertiary hyperparathyroidism in patients whose serum phosphate level does not increase with burosumab treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available