Journal
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1113622
Keywords
diabetic foot infection; diabetic foot ulcer; microbes; antimicrobial susceptibility; diabetes
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
By retrospectively analyzing the distribution of pathogenic bacteria and antimicrobial susceptibility in 581 patients with diabetic foot infections (DFI), it was found that there were variations in the distribution of pathogens and drug susceptibility among patients with different Wagner grades, providing guidance for clinical empirical treatment and rational selection of antibacterial drugs.
BackgroundTo investigate the distribution of microbes and drug susceptibility in patients with diabetic foot infections (DFI) and provide guidance for clinical empirical treatment and the rational selection of antibacterial drugs. MethodsRetrospective analysis of the pathogenic bacterium distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility isolated from 581 DFI patients with different Wagner grades. ResultsThe 534 positive samples included 473 cases (88.58%)) of monomicrobial infections and 61 cases (11.42%) of polymicrobial infections before antibiotic therapy. A total of 656 strains were cultivated, including 387 (58.99%) strains of gram-positive organisms (GPOs), 235 (35.82%) gram-negative bacilli (GNB), and 21 (3.20%) fungal strains. Polymicrobial infections mainly occurred in patients with Wagner grade 3-4 ulcers. GPOs were predominant in Wagner grades 1-3 (grade 1: 96.67%, grade 2: 76.52%, grade 3 62.81%), and the most common was Staphylococcus aureus (grade 1: 31.66%, grade 2: 33.04%, grade 3 35.53%). GNB were predominant in grades 4-5 (grade 4: 51.46%, grade 5:60%), and the most common GNB in Wagner grades 4-5 was Proteus (grade 4:27.88%, grade 5: 42.86%), while the most common GPO was Enterococcus (grade 4:34.48%, grade 5:25.00%). Staphylococcus (including MRSA) and Enterococcus were still highly sensitive to vancomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline. Most GNB were still highly sensitive to meropenem, tigecycline, ertapenem, and amikacin. Proteus was most sensitive to amikacin (97.14%), followed by meropenem (92%) and ertapenem (80%). ConclusionThe distribution of microbes and antimicrobial susceptibility in DFI patients varied with different Wagner grades. The most appropriate antimicrobial therapy should be selected based on the pathogen culture and antimicrobial susceptibility.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available