4.6 Article

Resolution of otitis media in a humanized mouse model

Journal

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.958540

Keywords

middle ear; leukocytes; inflammation; humanized mice; animal models otitis media; transgenic mice chimera

Funding

  1. NIH/NIDCD [R03 DC014801, R01 DC000129]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study describes the first use of humanized mice to study otitis media (OM). The results demonstrate that humanized mice with sufficient engraftment can recapitulate a normal middle ear inflammatory response and exhibit normal recovery. This model has many potential uses in OM research.
Otitis media (OM) is one of the largest public health problems of children and has devastating impacts in developing countries. The substantial medical and human costs involved have led to research to understand the disease and improve treatment. Animal models of OM have yielded critical information about the immune, inflammatory and genetic mechanisms of OM. However, it is important to link animal studies to human immune and inflammatory responses. In recent years, humanized mice have become a valuable tool to study the human immune system in an animal model. Here we describe the first use of humanized mice to study OM. We demonstrate that humanized mice with a sufficient degree of engraftment recapitulate a normal middle ear (ME) inflammatory response to bacterial infection, including the recruitment of human immune cells, and exhibit normal recovery. Moreover, these animals exhibit regulated expression of human-specific immune and inflammatory genes in the ME. In contrast, mice with insufficient engraftment fail to resolve OM. This model has many potential uses in OM research, including using hematopoietic stem cells from patients with differing degrees of OM susceptibility, to understand the role of human immune responses in proneness to this common childhood disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available