4.6 Review

Individual and combined effects of the GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms on type 2 diabetes mellitus risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.959291

Keywords

meta-analysis; genetic polymorphism; GSTM1; GSTP1; GSTT1; T2DM

Funding

  1. Nature Science Foundation of China
  2. Shanxi Basic Research Program [81500648]
  3. [20210302123239]
  4. [20210302123012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the relationship between glutathione-S-transferase polymorphisms and type 2 diabetes mellitus risk. The results suggest that individual variants of GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 may be associated with increased T2DM risk, but the combined effects are not statistically significant. Additionally, specific genotypes are linked to higher T2DM risk in certain populations.
Backgrounds: Compared with previously published meta-analyses, this is the first study to investigate the combined effects of glutathione-S-transferase polymorphisms (GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 IIe105Val) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk; moreover, the credibility of statistically significant associations was assessed; furthermore, many new original studies were published.Objectives: To determine the relationship between GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms with T2DM risk. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure Databases were searched. We quantify the relationship using crude odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals Moreover, the Venice criteria, false-positive report probability (FPRP), and Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP) were used to validate the significance of the results. Results: Overall, significantly increased T2DM risk was found between individual and combined effects of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms on T2DM risk, but, combined effects of the GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms was not statistically significant. GSTT1 gene polymorphism significantly increases the risk of T2DM complications, while GSTM1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms had no statistical significance. The GSTM1 null genotype was linked to a particularly increased risk of T2DM in Caucasians; the GSTT1 null genotype was connected to a significantly higher risk of T2DM in Asians and Indians; and the GSTP1 IIe105Val polymorphism was related to a substantially increased T2DM risk in Indians. Moreover, the GSTM1 and GSTT1 double null genotype was associated with substantially increased T2DM risk in Caucasians and Indians; the combined effects of GSTM1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms was associated with higher T2DM risk in Caucasians. However, all significant results were false when the Venice criteria, FPRP, and BFDP test were used (any FPRP > 0.2 and BFDP value > 0.8). Conclusion: The current analysis strongly suggests that the individual and combined effects of GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms might not be connected with elevated T2DM risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available