4.6 Article

Hydrophobic mismatch and sequence specificity compete when transmembrane helix-helix interactions are measured with the TOXCAT assay

Journal

FRONTIERS IN CHEMISTRY
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.1049310

Keywords

TOXCAT; GpA; dimerization; biological assay; hydrophobic mismatch; transmembrane helix; protein folding

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  2. DynaMem (state of Rhineland-Palatinate) [SCHN690/2-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the dimerization propensity of transmembrane helices in the cytoplasmic membrane of E. coli. The results suggest that the oligomerization propensity of a transmembrane helix can be influenced not only by sequence specificity but also by hydrophobic mismatch between the helix and the E. coli membrane.
Genetic assays capable of measuring the propensity of transmembrane helices to oligomerize within the cytoplasmic membrane of the bacterium E. coli are frequently used when sequence-specificity in transmembrane helix-helix interactions is investigated. In the present study, dimerization of the well-investigated wild-type and G83I-mutated transmembrane helix of the human glycophorin A protein was studied. Gradual prolongation of the transmembrane helix at the C-terminus with Leu residues lead to pronounced changes in the dimerization propensity when measured with the TOXCAT assay. Thus, besides sequence specificity, hydrophobic mismatch between the hydrophobic core of a studied transmembrane helix and the E. coli membrane can impact the oligomerization propensity of a transmembrane helix. This suggests that the results of genetic assays aiming at determining interactions of heterologous transmembrane helices within the E. coli membrane do not necessarily solely reflect sequence specificity in transmembrane helix-helix interactions, but might be additionally modulated by topological and structural effects caused by hydrophobic mismatch.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available