4.8 Article

Minimizing Age of Information in Multihop Energy-Harvesting Wireless Sensor Network

Journal

IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 24, Pages 25736-25751

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2022.3197428

Keywords

Age of Information (AoI); energy harvesting (EH) wireless sensor network (WSN); multihop WSN

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61632010, U19A2059]
  2. EPSRC Science of Sensor System Software (S4) [EP/N007565/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work considers the AoI minimization scheduling problem in multihop energy harvesting wireless sensor networks. An energy-adaptive distributed algorithm is proposed and theoretical bounds are derived. Experimental results show that the algorithm outperforms other schemes in all scenarios.
Age of Information (AoI), a metric measuring the information freshness, has drawn increased attention due to its importance in monitoring applications in which nodes send timestamped status updates to interested recipients, and timely updates about phenomena are important. In this work, we consider the AoI minimization scheduling problem in multihop energy harvesting (EH) wireless sensor networks (WSNs). We design the generation time of updates for nodes and develop transmission schedules under both protocol and physical interference models, aiming at achieving minimum peak AoI and average AoI among all nodes for a given time duration. We prove that it is an NP-Hard problem and propose an energy-adaptive, distributed algorithm called the minimizing AoI scheduling algorithm for general network (MAoIG). We derive its theoretical upper bounds for the peak and average AoI and a lower bound for peak AoI. The numerical results validate that MAoIG outperforms all of the baseline schemes in all scenarios and that the experimental results tightly track the theoretical upper bound optimal solutions while the lower bound tightness decreases with the number of nodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available