4.4 Article

Glycaemic Control in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Switching from Basal Insulin to Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300): Results from the REALI Pooled Database

Journal

DIABETES THERAPY
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 401-413

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13300-022-01356-3

Keywords

Basal insulin analogues; Basal insulin switching; Insulin glargine 300 U/ml; Neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin; Pooled database; Routine clinical practice; Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using pooled data from the REALI European database, this study evaluated the impact of previous basal insulin type on the effectiveness and safety of switching to insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) in people with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes. The results showed that regardless of the previous basal insulin therapy, switching to Gla-300 improved glycemic control without weight gain and with low incidences of symptomatic and severe hypoglycemia, but slightly greater glucose-lowering effectiveness was observed in people pre-treated with NPH insulin.
Introduction: Using pooled data from the REALI European database, we evaluated the impact of previous basal insulin (BI) type on real-life effectiveness and safety of switching to insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) in people with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes. Methods: Patient-level data were pooled from 11 prospective, open-label, 24-week studies. Participants were classified according to the type of prior BI. Of the 4463 participants, 1282 (28.7%) were pre-treated with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin and 2899 (65.0%) with BI analogues (BIAs), and 282 (6.3%) had undetermined prior BI. Results: There were no meaningful differences in baseline characteristics between subgroups, except for a higher prevalence of diabetic neuropathy in the NPH subgroup (21.6% versus 7.8% with BIAs). Mean +/- standard deviation haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) decreased from 8.73 +/- 1.15% and 8.35 +/- 0.95% at baseline to 7.71 +/- 1.09% and 7.82 +/- 1.06% at week 24 in the NPH and BIA subgroups, respectively. Least squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c was -0.85% (95% confidence interval -0.94 to -0.77) in NPH subgroup and -0.70% (- 0.77 to -0.64) in BIA subgroup, with a LS mean absolute difference between subgroups of 0.16 (0.06-0.26; p = 0.002). Gla-300 mean daily dose was slightly increased at week 24 by 0.07 U/kg/day (approximately 6 U/day) in both subgroups. Incidences of symptomatic and severe hypoglycaemia were low, without body weight change. Conclusions: Irrespective of previous BI therapy (NPH insulin or BIAs), switching to Gla-300 improved glycaemic control without weight gain and with low symptomatic and severe hypoglycaemia incidences. However, a slightly greater glucose-lowering effectiveness was observed in people pre-treated with NPH insulin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available