4.5 Article

How should we handle predatory journals in evidence synthesis? A descriptive survey-based cross-sectional study of evidence synthesis experts

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Methodological quality was critically low in 9/10 systematic reviews in advanced cancer patients-A methodological study

Waldemar Siemens et al.

Summary: This study assessed the methodological quality of systematic reviews (SRs) and the consideration of heterogeneity, finding that the majority of SRs had low quality, mainly due to issues such as non-registration and lack of reporting excluded full-texts. Heterogeneity in trial results was not explored in some SRs, while others considered clinical or methodological heterogeneity, highlighting the importance of improving the quality of future SRs through awareness of quality criteria.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Should I include studies from predatory journals in a systematic review? Interim guidance for systematic reviewers

Zachary Munn et al.

Summary: A systematic review involves evaluating and synthesizing the best available evidence to answer a specific question. The rise of predatory journals poses a threat to the validity of systematic reviews.

JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS (2021)

Editorial Material Health Care Sciences & Services

Predatory publishing dilutes and distorts evidence in systematic reviews

Jill A. Hayden

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)

Review Rehabilitation

Tai Chi for improving balance and reducing falls: An overview of 14 systematic reviews

Dongling Zhong et al.

ANNALS OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE (2020)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review

Samantha Cukier et al.

BMC MEDICINE (2020)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Supporting a definition of predatory publishing

Edoardo Aromataris et al.

BMC MEDICINE (2020)

Article Integrative & Complementary Medicine

The quality of Cochrane systematic reviews of acupuncture: an overview

Zhaochen Ji et al.

BMC COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE AND THERAPIES (2020)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

How predatory journals leak into PubMed

Andrea Manca et al.

CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL (2018)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

A computationally simple central monitoring procedure, effectively applied to empirical trial data with known fraud

Rutger M. van den Bor et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Stop this waste of people, animals and money

David Moher et al.

NATURE (2017)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers

Tove Faber Frandsen

SCIENTOMETRICS (2017)

Article Psychology, Social

The GRIM Test: A Simple Technique Detects Numerous Anomalies in the Reporting of Results in Psychology

Nicholas J. L. Brown et al.

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE (2017)

Article Communication

PRESENCE OF ALLEGED PREDATORY JOURNALS IN BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASES: ANALYSIS OF BEALL'S LIST

Marta Somoza-Fernandez et al.

PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION (2016)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

You are invited to submit...

David Moher et al.

BMC MEDICINE (2015)

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

Who publishes in predatory journals?

Jingfeng Xia et al.

JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2015)