4.4 Article

Mid-Term Outcomes of Navigation-Assisted Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Adjusted Mechanical Alignment

Journal

ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 230-238

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/os.13595

Keywords

Adjusted mechanical alignment; Mechanical alignment; Navigation; Soft tissue balance; Total knee arthroplasty

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the mid-term outcomes of navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA) technique. The study found that aMA technique obtained satisfactory mid-term clinical outcomes and may be associated with better early clinical outcomes than conventional mechanical alignment (MA) technique.
ObjectiveThe adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA) technique is an extension of conventional mechanical alignment (MA), which has rarely been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate mid-term outcomes of navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using aMA. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study enrolled 63 consecutive patients (77 knees) who underwent navigation-assisted TKA using aMA between September 2017 and October 2019. Fifty-two consecutive patients (61 knees) who underwent TKA using MA during the same period were assessed as the controlled group. The demographic data and perioperative data were recorded. The parameters of resection and soft tissue balance including tibia resection angle, frontal femoral angle, axial femoral angle, joint line translation, medial and lateral gap in extension and flexion position were recorded. Radiographic parameters and functional scores including the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) were evaluated. Surgery-related complications were recorded. The average follow-up was 3.5 years, with a minimum of 2.4 years. ResultsThe frontal femoral angle was 2.55 degrees +/- 1.08 degrees in aMA group versus 0.26 degrees +/- 0.60 degrees in MA group (p < 0.001). The axial femoral angle was 3.07 degrees +/- 2.23 degrees external in aMA group versus 2.30 degrees +/- 1.70 degrees in MA group (p = 0.027). The lateral flexion gap was wider in the aMA group, with a mean of 0.71 mm more laxity (p = 0.001). Postoperative coronal alignment was 177.03 degrees +/- 1.82 degrees in aMA group versus 178.14 degrees +/- 1.69 degrees in MA group (p < 0.001). The coronal femoral component angle was 92.62 degrees +/- 2.78 degrees in aMA group versus 90.85 degrees +/- 2.01 degrees in MA group (p < 0.001). Both aMA-TKA and MA-TKA achieved satisfactory mid-term clinical outcomes. However, the HSS scores at 1 month postoperatively were significantly higher using aMA than using MA (p < 0.001). ConclusionNavigation-assisted TKA using aMA technique obtained satisfactory mid-term clinical outcomes. The aMA technique aims to produce a biomimetic wider lateral flexion-extension gap and minimize releases of soft tissues, which might be associated with better early clinical outcomes than MA technique.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available