4.7 Article

Parallel photonic accelerator for decision making using optical spatiotemporal chaos

Journal

OPTICA
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 339-348

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OPTICA.477433

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Photonic accelerators have gained attention for use in AI applications, but the scalability of photonic decision making has not been demonstrated in experiments. A parallel photonic decision-making system using optical spatiotemporal chaos is proposed to solve large-scale multi-armed bandit problems. The experimental demonstration shows the superiority of the proposed parallel principle for correct decision making, with an exponent of 0.86. This facilitates photonic decision making for future photonic accelerators.
Photonic accelerators have attracted increasing attention for use in artificial intelligence applications. The multi-armed bandit problem is a fundamental problem of decision making using reinforcement learning. However, to the best of our knowledge, the scalability of photonic decision making has not yet been demonstrated in experiments because of the technical difficulties in the physical realization. We propose a parallel photonic decision-making system to solve large-scale multi-armed bandit problems using optical spatiotemporal chaos. We solved a 512-armed bandit problem online, which is larger than those in previous experiments by two orders of magnitude. The scaling property for correct decision making is examined as a function of the number of slot machines, evaluated as an exponent of 0.86. This exponent is smaller than that in previous studies, indicating the superiority of the proposed parallel principle. This experimental demonstration facilitates photonic decision making to solve large-scale multi-armed bandit problems for future photonic accelerators. (c) 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available