4.7 Article

Device-independent verification of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering

Journal

OPTICA
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 66-71

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OPTICA.456382

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work proposes and experimentally demonstrates a device-independent protocol for certifying the presence of entanglement based on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering. The protocol is able to verify all bipartite EPR-steerable states by taking advantage of a measurement-device-independent technique and self-testing. This work provides further insight into quantum physics and could facilitate the realistic implementation of secure quantum information processing tasks.
Entanglement lies at the heart of quantum mechanics, and has been identified as an essential resource for diverse appli-cations in quantum information. If entanglement could be verified without any trust in the devices of observers, i.e., in a device-independent (DI) way, then high security could be guaranteed for various quantum information processing tasks. In this work, we propose and experimentally demonstrate a DI protocol to certify the presence of entanglement based on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering. We first establish the DI verification framework by taking advantage of a measurement-device-independent technique and self-testing, which is able to verify all bipartite EPR-steerable states. In the scenario of three-measurement settings per party, the protocol is robust in tolerance of inefficient mea-surements and imperfect self-testing. Moreover, a four-photon experiment is implemented for verification beyond Bell nonlocal states. Our work enables further insight into quantum physics and could facilitate realistic implementation of secure quantum information processing tasks. (c) 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available