4.7 Article

Mechanisms of Phenotypic Rifampicin Tolerance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing Genotype Strain B0/W148 Revealed by Proteomics

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 1194-1204

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b01073

Keywords

rifampicin; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; dormancy; quantitative proteomics; phosphoproteomics

Funding

  1. National Institute for Public Health
  2. Environment (RIVM), SOR Project [S/000134]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The successful Russian clone B0/W148 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing is well-known for its capacity to develop antibiotic resistance. During treatment, resistant mutants can occur that have inheritable resistance to specific antibiotics. Next to mutations, M. tuberculosis has several mechanisms that increase their tolerance to a variety of antibiotics. Insights in the phenotypic mechanisms that contribute to drug tolerance will increase our understanding of how antibiotic resistance develops in M. tuberculosis. In this study, we examined the (phospho)proteome dynamics in M. tuberculosis Beijing strain B0/W148 when exposed to a high dose of rifampicin; one of the most potent first-line antibiotics. A total of 2,534 proteins and 191 phosphorylation sites were identified, and revealed the differential regulation of DosR regulon proteins, which are necessary for the development of a dormant phenotype that is less susceptible to antibiotics. By examining independent phenotypic markers of dormancy, we show that persisters of in vitro rifampicin exposure entered a metabolically hypoactive state, which yields rifampicin and other antibiotics largely ineffective. These new insights in the role of protein regulation and post-translational modifications during the initial phase of rifampicin treatment reveal a shortcoming in the antituberculosis regimen that is administered to 8-9 million individuals annually.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available