4.5 Article

Camera calibration method for an infrared horizon sensor with a large field of view

Journal

Publisher

ZHEJIANG UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1631/FITEE.2200079

Keywords

Infrared horizon sensor; Ultra-field infrared camera; Camera calibration; V447

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a novel camera calibration method for infrared horizon sensors is presented and validated. The method utilizes three infrared targets as control points and a rotary table to evenly distribute the control points in the field of view. Compared to traditional methods, this method is easier to implement and cost-effective, resulting in at least a 30% improvement in calibration accuracy.
Inadequate geometric accuracy of cameras is the main constraint to improving the precision of infrared horizon sensors with a large field of view (FOV). An enormous FOV with a blind area in the center greatly limits the accuracy and feasibility of traditional geometric calibration methods. A novel camera calibration method for infrared horizon sensors is presented and validated in this paper. Three infrared targets are used as control points. The camera is mounted on a rotary table. As the table rotates, these control points will be evenly distributed in the entire FOV. Compared with traditional methods that combine a collimator and a rotary table which cannot effectively cover a large FOV and require harsh experimental equipment, this method is easier to implement at a low cost. A corresponding three-step parameter estimation algorithm is proposed to avoid precisely measuring the positions of the camera and the control points. Experiments are implemented with 10 infrared horizon sensors to verify the effectiveness of the calibration method. The results show that the proposed method is highly stable, and that the calibration accuracy is at least 30% higher than those of existing methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available