4.8 Article

Impact of exposure to malaria and nutritional status on responses to the experimental malaria vaccine ChAd63 MVA ME-TRAP in 5-17 month-old children in Burkina Faso

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1058227

Keywords

malaria; vaccine; viral vector; ME-TRAP; Burkina Faso; immunosuppression; nutrition

Categories

Funding

  1. European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP)
  2. Malaria Vectored Vaccines Consortium (MVVC) [IP.2008.31100.001]
  3. EDCTP
  4. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA)
  5. UK Medical Research Council (MRC)
  6. Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research
  7. Irish Aid, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Ireland
  8. Wellcome Trust [109026/Z/15/Z]
  9. Wellcome Trust [109026/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the impact of malaria exposure on immune responses to a malaria vaccine and found that individuals with previous exposure to malaria had reduced vaccine responses. This could have implications for testing and deploying vaccines in areas with high malaria endemicity.
The experimental malaria vaccine ChAd63 MVA ME-TRAP previously showed protective efficacy against Plasmodium falciparum infection in Phase IIa sporozoite challenge studies in adults in the United Kingdom and in a Phase IIb field efficacy trial in Kenyan adults. However, it failed to demonstrate efficacy in a phase IIb trial in 5-17 month-old children in an area of high malaria transmission in Burkina Faso. This secondary analysis investigated whether exposure to malaria or nutritional status might be associated with reduced responses to vaccination in this cohort. Parasite blood smears and anti-AMA-1 IgG titres were used to assess history of exposure to malaria and weight-for-length Z scores were calculated to assess nutritional status. Differences in vaccine-specific anti-TRAP IgG titre and ex vivo IFN gamma ELISpot response were measured between groups. In total, n = 336 volunteers randomised to receive the experimental vaccine regimen were included in this analysis. A positive smear microscopy result was associated with reduced anti-TRAP IgG titre (geometric mean titre: 2775 (uninfected) vs 1968 (infected), p = 0.025), whilst anti-AMA-1 IgG titres were weakly negatively correlated with reduced ex vivo IFN gamma ELISpot response (r = -0.18, p = 0.008). Nutritional status was not associated with either humoral or cellular immunogenicity. Vaccine efficacy was also measured separately for vaccinees with positive and negative blood smears. Although not significant in either group compared to controls, vaccine efficacy measured by Cox hazard ratio was higher in uninfected compared to infected individuals (19.8% [p = 0.50] vs 3.3% [p = 0.69]). Overall, this data suggests exposure to malaria may be associated with impaired vaccine immunogenicity. This may have consequences for the testing and eventual deployment of various vaccines, in areas with high endemicity for malaria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available