4.7 Article

Impact of the High-Emission Event Duration and Sampling Frequency on the Uncertainty in Emission Estimates

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages 1063-1067

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00731

Keywords

methane; direct measurement; greenhouse gas inventories; reconciliation; variability; sampling; intermittency

Funding

  1. Gas Technology Institute through Project Veritas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Short duration measurements of methane emissions from oil and gas operations have uncertainties due to the variability of emissions. Sampling frequency and duration of emission events affect the accuracy of annual emission estimates. This study found that routine emissions are accurately captured with semiannual sampling, but infrequent high-emission rate events increase the error of annual estimates. The temporal persistence of emission events is an important factor in measurement protocol design.
Short duration remote sensing measurements of methane emissions from oil and gas operations are being deployed at a large scale, but interpretation of these snapshot measurements is complex due to the spatial and temporal variability of methane emissions. The accuracy and precision of annual emission estimates extrapolated from short duration measurements depend on the measurement frequency and complexity of temporal emission patterns. This work examines sampling uncertainties associated with short duration measurements of varying frequencies for methane emissions from a group of sites representing the Barnett Shale region. Routine, frequent emissions are accurately captured with minimal bias through semiannual sampling; however, infrequent high-emission rate events increase the error associated with annual emission estimates, even under the assumption of no measurement uncertainty. If emission events have a duration of <1 week, monthly sampling has an estimated sampling error of >15%. For quarterly sampling with emission events that persist for <1 month, the sampling error is >30%. There is also negative bias associated with quarterly, semiannual, and annual sampling, which suggests infrequent campaigns may be systemically underestimating emissions. The sampling error increases as the duration of the high-emission events becomes shorter, making the temporal persistence of emission events an important factor in designing measurement protocols.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available