4.7 Review

Appraising the Water-Energy-Food Nexus From a Sustainable Development Perspective: A Maturing Paradigm?

Journal

EARTHS FUTURE
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021EF002622

Keywords

nexus; water-energy-food; governance; policy; social science; sustainable development

Funding

  1. Interdisciplinary Global Development Centre (IDGC)
  2. Centre for the Evaluation of Complexity Across the Nexus (CECAN)
  3. York Environmental Sustainability Institute (YESI)
  4. Stockholm Environmental Institute (SEI)
  5. York Institute of Tropical Ecosystems (KITE)
  6. York Global Partnership
  7. Centre for the Evaluation of Complexity Across the Nexus
  8. UK Economic and Social Research Council large centre [ES/N012550/1]
  9. Asia Hub from Nanjing Agricultural University [2017-AH-10]
  10. Climate Research for Development Postdoctoral Fellowship [CR4D-19-21]
  11. African Women in Climate Change Science Fellowship
  12. UK's Research and Innovation's Global Challenges Research Fund [ES/P011500]
  13. H2020 Marie Skodowska-Curie Actions [706151]
  14. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [706151] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The water-energy-food (WEF) nexus is an important approach for addressing sustainable development challenges. However, current research is primarily focused on the physical and natural sciences, with insufficient engagement with social, political, and economic dimensions. In the Global South, WEF research covers a wide range of domains, but there are still gaps in implementation and operationalization. Addressing the complexity of the nexus requires alternative perspectives to manage policy integration, trade-offs, and winners and losers.
The water-energy-food (WEF) nexus is a prominent approach for addressing today's sustainable development challenges. In our critical appraisal of the WEF, covering different approaches, drivers, enablers, and applications, we emphasize the situation across the Global South (Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean). Here, WEF research covers at least 23 focal domains. We find that the nexus is still a maturing paradigm primarily rooted in a physical and natural sciences framing, which is itself embedded in a neoliberal securities narrative. While providing insights and tools to address the systemic interdependencies between resource sectors whose exploitation, degradation, and sub-optimal management contribute to (un)sustainable development, there is still insufficient engagement with social, political, and economic dimensions. Progress related to climate, urbanization, and resource consumption is encouraging, but while governance and finance are central enablers of current and future nexus systems, gaps remain in relation to implementation and operationalization. Harnessing the nexus for sustainable development across the Global South means recognizing that it is more than a biophysical system, but also a multi-scale complex of people, institutions, and infrastructure, affected by history and context. Addressing this complexity requires alternative and possibly challenging perspectives to counter dominant narratives, and manage problems associated with policy integration, trade-offs, and winners and losers. We outline 10 emergent research areas that we think can contribute to this endeavor and enable the nexus to be a stronger policy force.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available