4.6 Review

On the Finite Element Modeling of the Lumbar Spine: A Schematic Review

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13020958

Keywords

finite element analysis; spinal column; biomechanics; modelling; lumbar spine; computational simulations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Finite element modelling of the lumbar spine is challenging but crucial for understanding spinal biomechanics and developing innovative therapies. Patient-specific computational simulations require validation and verification to ensure accurate results.
Finite element modelling of the lumbar spine is a challenging problem. Lower back pain is among the most common pathologies in the global populations, owing to which the patient may need to undergo surgery. The latter may differ in nature and complexity because of spinal disease and patient contraindications (i.e., aging). Today, the understanding of spinal column biomechanics may lead to better comprehension of the disease progression as well as to the development of innovative therapeutic strategies. Better insight into the spine's biomechanics would certainly guarantee an evolution of current device-based treatments. In this setting, the computational approach appears to be a remarkable tool for simulating physiological and pathological spinal conditions, as well as for various aspects of surgery. Patient-specific computational simulations are constantly evolving, and require a number of validation and verification challenges to be overcome before they can achieve true and accurate results. The aim of the present schematic review is to provide an overview of the evolution and recent advances involved in computational finite element modelling (FEM) of spinal biomechanics and of the fundamental knowledge necessary to develop the best modeling approach in terms of trustworthiness and reliability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available