4.6 Article

Reducing the Complexity of Musculoskeletal Models Using Gaussian Process Emulators

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app122412932

Keywords

statistical modelling; statistical emulators; sensitivity analysis; Gaussian Process; Sobol; musculoskeletal model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a method using Sobol's sensitivity analysis to evaluate the influence of muscles on joint contact forces. The results showed that there are muscles that have little effect on the prediction of joint contact forces, allowing for an accurate representation of the musculoskeletal system in a shorter time.
Musculoskeletal models (MSKMs) are used to estimate the muscle and joint forces involved in human locomotion, often associated with the onset of degenerative musculoskeletal pathologies (e.g., osteoarthritis). Subject-specific MSKMs offer more accurate predictions than their scaled-generic counterparts. This accuracy is achieved through time-consuming personalisation of models and manual tuning procedures that suffer from potential repeatability errors, hence limiting the wider application of this modelling approach. In this work we have developed a methodology relying on Sobol's sensitivity analysis (SSA) for ranking muscles based on their importance to the determination of the joint contact forces (JCFs) in a cohort of older women. The thousands of data points required for SSA are generated using Gaussian Process emulators, a Bayesian technique to infer the input-output relationship between nonlinear models from a limited number of observations. Results show that there is a pool of muscles whose personalisation has little effects on the predictions of JCFs, allowing for a reduced but still accurate representation of the musculoskeletal system within shorter timeframes. Furthermore, joint forces in subject-specific and generic models are influenced by different sets of muscles, suggesting the existence of a model-specific component to the sensitivity analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available