4.8 Article

Improving the cycle life of a high-rate, high-potential aqueous dual ion battery using hyper-dendritic zinc and copper hexacyanoferrate

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 305, Issue -, Pages 22-29

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.065

Keywords

Prussian blue analogue; Hyper-dendritic zinc; In situ EDXRD; Aqueous dual ion battery; High capacity retention; Long battery cycle life

Funding

  1. NSF CMMI [1402872]
  2. NSF DMR [1156422]
  3. NSF IGERT [0903661]
  4. XEROX UAC award
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Materials Research [1156422] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Directorate For Engineering
  8. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1402872] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prussian Blue Analogue (PBA)-Zn aqueous batteries are attractive because of the high potential of PBA against Zn (similar to 1.7 V), relative safety of the system, and high rate capability. But, despite the long cycle life of PBA half-cells, full PBA-Zn battery systems studied thus far have typically reported only up to 100 cycles and suffer significant capacity fade beyond that. In this work we demonstrate that the loss in capacity retention and cycle life is a combined effect of Zn2+ ion poisoning at the PBA cathode, as well as dendrite formation in the zinc anode. We address both these issues via the use of a dual ion (Na+ as the primary charge carrier) electrolyte and hyper-dendritic Zinc (HD Zn) as the anode. The copper hexacyanoferrate (CuHcf) vs. HD Zn system with Na+ ion electrolyte demonstrated herein exhibits 90% (83%) capacity retention after 300(500) cycles at a 5C rate and a 3% reduction in usable capacity from 1C to 5C. Detailed characterization is done using in situ synchrotron energy-dispersive XRD (EDXRD), conventional XRD, XPS, SEM, TEM, and electrochemical techniques. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available