4.7 Article

Cl- and Al-Doped Argyrodite Solid Electrolyte Li6PS5Cl for All-Solid-State Lithium Batteries with Improved Ionic Conductivity

Journal

NANOMATERIALS
Volume 12, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12244355

Keywords

all-solid-state battery; solid electrolyte; argyrodite; ionic conductivity; doping

Funding

  1. Ministry of Economy and Finance (MOEF)
  2. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE), South Korea
  3. [JA220008]
  4. [20019249]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports the improved ionic conductivity of a solid electrolyte, Li6PS5Cl, in all-solid-state lithium batteries through the co-doping of chlorine and aluminum elements. The Cl- and Al-doped Li6PS5Cl electrolyte exhibits a significantly higher ionic conductivity (7.29 x 10(-3) S cm(-1)) at room temperature, which is 4.7 times higher than that of Li6PS5Cl. The low activation energy (0.09 eV) of the doped electrolyte further enhances its conductivity.
Argyrodite solid electrolytes such as lithium phosphorus sulfur chloride (Li6PS5Cl) have recently attracted great attention due to their excellent lithium-ion transport properties, which are applicable to all-solid-state lithium batteries. In this study, we report the improved ionic conductivity of an argyrodite solid electrolyte, Li6PS5Cl, in all-solid-state lithium batteries via the co-doping of chlorine (Cl) and aluminum (Al) elements. Electrochemical analysis was conducted on the doped argyrodite structure of Li6PS5Cl, which revealed that the substitution of cations and anions greatly improved the ionic conductivity of solid electrolytes. The ionic conductivity of the Cl- and Al-doped Li6PS5Cl (Li5.4Al0.1PS4.7Cl1.3) electrolyte was 7.29 x 10(-3) S cm(-1) at room temperature, which is 4.7 times higher than that of Li6PS5Cl. The Arrhenius plot of the Li5.4Al0.1PS4.7Cl1.3 electrolyte further elucidated its low activation energy at 0.09 eV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available