4.7 Review

A Structural Analysis of Proteinaceous Nanotube Cavities and Their Applications in Nanotechnology

Journal

NANOMATERIALS
Volume 12, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12224080

Keywords

protein nanotube; coiled coil assembly; cavity; structural examination; internal physicochemical properties; biocompatible nanomaterial; carrier system; biotechnology

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [320847352300-2000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein nanotubes have unique properties that make them useful in drug delivery, biosensors, and energy storage. Understanding the structural features of the cavities in nanotubes is crucial for their effective application. This review presents the chemical and physical diversity of protein nanotube cavities and their potential applications in materials science, particularly in biotechnology.
Protein nanotubes offer unique properties to the materials science field that allow them to fulfill various functions in drug delivery, biosensors and energy storage. Protein nanotubes are chemically diverse, modular, biodegradable and nontoxic. Furthermore, although the initial design or repurposing of such nanotubes is highly complex, the field has matured to understand underlying chemical and physical properties to a point where applications are successfully being developed. An important feature of a nanotube is its ability to bind ligands via its internal cavities. As ligands of interest vary in size, shape and chemical properties, cavities have to be able to accommodate very specific features. As such, understanding cavities on a structural level is essential for their effective application. The objective of this review is to present the chemical and physical diversity of protein nanotube cavities and highlight their potential applications in materials science, specifically in biotechnology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available