4.8 Article

Enhanced proton conductivity of Nafion composite membrane by incorporating phosphoric acid-loaded covalent organic framework

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 332, Issue -, Pages 265-273

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.135

Keywords

Phosphoric acid; Covalent organic framework; Nafion; Composite membrane; Proton conductivity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21576189]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Separation Membranes and Membrane Processes (Tianjin Polytechnic University) [M2-201504]
  3. Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B06006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Design and fabrication of efficient proton transport channels within solid electrolytes is crucial and challenging to new energy-relevant devices such as proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). In this study, the phosphoric acid (H3PO4) molecules are impregnated into SNW-1-type covalent organic frameworks (COFs) via vacuum assisted method. High loading of H3PO4 in SNW-1 and low guest leaching rate are achieved due to the similar diameter between H3PO4 and micropores in SNW-1. Then the COF-based composite membranes are fabricated for the first time with impregnated COFs (H3PO4@SNW-1) and Nafion matrix. For the composite membranes, the acid-base pairs formed between H3PO4@SNW-1 networks and Nafion optimize the interfacial interactions and hydrophilic domains. The acidic -PO3H2 groups in pores of H3PO4@SNW-1 provide abundant proton transfer sites. As a result, the continuous proton transfer channels with low energy barrier are created. At the filler content of 15 wt%, the composite membrane exhibits a superior proton conductivity of 0.0604 S cm(-1) at 51% relative humidity and 80 degrees C. At the same time, the maximum power density of single fuel cell is 603% higher than that of the recast Nafion membrane. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available